Evidence Against Neo-Darwinism From the Fossil Record by Dr. Günter Bechly

insert h in below link

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luxbHIF3MAU

Some facts: Scientists Admit: Evolution Not Supported By Facts!

"But the World Is So Old...Isn't It?

"All the above (radiometric) methods for dating the age of the earth, its various strata, and its fossils are questionable, because the rates are likely to have fluctuated widely over earth history...It is obvious that radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often quite different (sometimes by hundreds of millions of years). There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological 'clock.' The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologist and evolutionists..." (W.D. Stansfield, Ph.D., Instructor of Biology, California Polytech State University, The Science of Evolution, Macmillan, 1987. "

"Carbon-14 Will Tell Us...Won't It?

"When the blood of a seal, freshly killed at McMurdo Sound in the Antarctic was tested by carbon-14, it showed the seal had died 1,300 years ago." (From W. Dort Jr., Ph.D. -- Geology, Professor, University of Kansas, quoted in Antarctic Journal of the United States, 1971.

"The hair on the Chekurovka mammoth was found to have a carbon-14 age of 26,000 years but the peaty soil in which is was preserved was found to have a carbon-14 dating of only 5,600 years." (Radiocarbon Journal, Vol. 8, 1966.) "

Do Fossils Prove It?

"...I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transition in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them...Yet Gould and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils...I will lay it on the line--there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument." (Personal letter from Dr. Colin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, to L. Sunderland.)

"Despite the bright promise that paleontology provides a means of 'seeing' evolution, it has presented some nasty difficulties for evolutionists, the most notorious of which is the presence of 'gaps' in the fossil record. Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them..." (David B. Kitts, Ph.D. -- Zoology, Head Curator, Department of Geology, Stoval Museum, and well-known evolutionary paleontologist. Evolution, Vol. 28, Sept. 1974. "

But What About Those Bones?

"...not being a paleontologist, I don't want to pour too much scorn on paleontologists, but if you were to spend your life picking up bones and finding little fragments of head and little fragments of jaw, there's a very strong desire to exaggerate the importance of those fragments..." (Dr. Greg Kirby in an address given at a meeting of the Biology Teachers Association of South Australia in 1976. Dr. Kirby was the Senior Lecturer in Population Biology at Flinders University and was giving the case for evolution.)

"A five million year old piece of bone that was thought to be the collarbone of a humanlike creature is actually part of a dolphin rib...The problem with a lot of anthropologists is that they want so much to find a hominid that any scrap of bone becomes a hominid bone." (Dr. Tim White, anthropologist, University of California, Berkeley, quoted in New Scientist, April 28, 1983.

Evolutionists Great Con Men

"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact." (Dr. T.N. Tahmisian. Atomic Energy Commission, The Fresno Bee, August 20, 1959.

"...most people assume that fossils provide a very important part of the general argument made in favor of Darwinian interpretation of the history of life. Unfortunately, this is not strictly true." (Dr. David Raup, Curator, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago. Quoted from "Conflicts between Darwin and paleontology," Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin, Vol. 50 (1), 1979.) " ttps://www.chick.com/battle-cry/article?id=Scientists-Admit-Evolution-Not-Supported-By-Facts!

SCOTMAN, LIKE YOU, I WAS AN ATHEIST BEFORE I BECAME A BELIEVER AND TRUSTED ONLY WHAT MY EYES COULD SEE (EVEN THOUGH, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO THEORY OF EVOLUTION ONLY THAT SOME INSECTS AND BIRDS CAN MUTATE THE SIZE OF THEIR BEAKS OR WINGS AND SUCH BUT NOT JUMP THE SPECIES HIERARCHY

YOU MAY HAVE OVERLOOKED ONE TRUTH THAT THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF INTELLIGENCE CAN NOT BE LOCKED UP INSIDE A MATERIAL BODY, IT CAN NOT BE RESTRAINED BY ANY LIMITATIONS

THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF INTELLIGENCE IS OF COURSE THE ENERGY ITSELF, NOT THE ONE YOUR BODY CAN GIVE OFF (KINETIC ENERGY), BUT THE ONE WHICH IS NOT LIMITED BY TIME OR THOUGHT PROCESSES AND ITSELF IS UNMATCHED IN POWER AND POTENTIAL

GOD IS A CREATOR, THAT IS HIS OCCUPATION "I AM THAT I AM" HE SAID TO MOSES

IF YOU CAN NOT REALIZE THAT YOU WERE MADE OUT OF THAT ENERGY, THEN I TRULY FEEL SORRY FOR YOU BECAUSE THOSE THAT HAVE PERMITTED THEMSELVES TO BELIEVE IN GOD "CAN" SEE HIM WITH THEIR EYES AND HE SHOWS THEM WHAT WILL BE

GOD IS REAL, NOT ONLY BECAUSE I WANT HIM TO BE SO, OF COURSE I DO BUT BECAUSE HE JUST IS

WHAT WE THINK ABOUT IT CHANGES NOTHING WHATSOEVER

WE LIVE IN A REALM OF MAN BUT WE HAVE DNA GOD DESIGNED FOR US

MAN CAN NOT EVOLVE INTO SOMETHING ELSE BUT MAN CAN GROW IN HIS POWERS OF REASONING AND OUTDO ALL OTHER CREATURES HERE ON EARTH HOWEVER, A MAN CAN NOT OUTGROW GOD WHO DESIGNED HIM AND WHAT A GOOD THING THAT IS, HEY;

NO, I DON'T HATE YOU, I LOVE YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE ONE OF GOD'S CHILDREN AND I'M NOT YOUR JUDGE

WE ALL NEED TO BE LOVED AND ONLY THEN WE CAN COME TO GOD WHEN WE FEEL HIS LOVE EXTENDED TO US

MAY YOUR HEART UNLOCK ITS FULL POTENTIAL TO LOVE

Hit the nail on the head there friend.

America is no longer a moral country and it's only going to get worse.

I agree with all of it!